STATE v. BEY

No. 97-2247.

85 Ohio St.3d 487 (1999)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BEY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 19, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig T. Pearson, Lucas County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Jeffrey M. Ganiso and Spiros P. Cocoves, for appellant.


COOK, J.

In this appeal, Bey advances twenty-two propositions of law. (See Appendix, infra.) We have considered each of Bey's propositions of law, independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against mitigating factors, and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Bey's convictions and the sentence of death.

I. Other Acts Issues

A. Proposition of Law I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases