The stipulation of settlement between petitioner and the tenants calling for a lifting of the finding of harassment nunc pro tunc as of the date the fine was paid was properly rejected by respondent as contrary to 9 NYCRR 2206.5 (c), at least in the absence of "convincing evidence" that the conditions that led to the finding of harassment no longer existed as of the date such nunc pro tunc application was sought (Matter of Meko Holding
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF 1504 ASSOCIATES, L. P. v. ROLDAN
258 A.D.2d 302 (1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 183
In the Matter of 1504 ASSOCIATES, L. P., Appellant, v. PAUL A. ROLDAN, as Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 9, 1999.
Decided February 9, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
