1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 265 A.D.2d
  5. 265 A.D.2d 294 (1999)
 

DIAKOVASILIS v. BRIGHT AND SUNNY CORP.

265 A.D.2d 294 (1999)

696 N.Y.S.2d 220

IRENE DIAKOVASILIS et al., Appellants, v. BRIGHT AND SUNNY CORP., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 4, 1999.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' contention that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence photographs of the sidewalk without first redacting the alleged dates of processing imprinted on the back is without merit. The photographs were properly authenticated by testimony that they fairly and accurately represented the condition of the sidewalk on the date of the accident (see, Moore v Leaseway Transp. Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases