While it is true, as plaintiff argues, that her sisters had to sign releases in order for the stipulation of settlement that she agreed to in open court to take effect, it is clear that the parties intended to be bound by the stipulation at the time it was made, and that getting the sisters, for whom plaintiff was apparently acting, to sign the releases was viewed by all present, particularly the court, as a ministerial act (cf., Rapp v Briarcliff
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
TOOKER v. CASTILLE
260 A.D.2d 298 (1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 56
ROBIN TOOKER, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CLAUDE CASTILLE et al., Defendants, and ALICE B. TOOKER et al., Respondents. RASKIN & KREMINS, L. L. P., Nonparty Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 27, 1999.
Decided April 27, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
