SMITH v. XEROX CORP.

Nos. 98-7178, 98-7182, 98-7184, 98-7186, 98-7188, 98-7196, 98-7198, 98-7202, 98-7204, 98-7206, 98-7208 and 98-7212.

196 F.3d 358 (1999)

John B. SMITH, Harold Wado, John S. Bernhard, Philip D. Cufari, Salvatore Catalano, Robert H. Gusciora, Patricia Rake, Pedro Santiago, Judith Caruana, Edward Lalik, Jr., Eugene Hosenfeld and George Hamann, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: November 5, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore S. Kantor, Bilgore, Reich, Levine, Kroll & Kantor, Rochester, N.Y. for Plaintiffs-Appellants Smith, Wado, Lalik, Bernhard, Caruana, Hosenfeld, Hamann, Gusciora, Rake and Santiago.

Donna Marianetti, Rochester, N.Y. for Plaintiffs-Appellants Cufari and Catalano.

Margaret A. Clemens, Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle LLP, Rochester, N.Y. for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: NEWMAN, LEVAL, PARKER, Circuit Judges.


PARKER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Chief Judge) entered January 16, 1998, granting summary judgment for Xerox Corporation ("Xerox") on the plaintiffs' employment discrimination claims based on both disparate treatment and disparate impact theories.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Facts

The facts of this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases