Defendant has not established that the court's comments indicating that it had been the victim of crimes on several occasions, as part of its general address to the panel of prospective jurors, displayed any bias or otherwise caused any prejudice.
We find the sentences to be excessive to the extent indicated. In view of our direction that all sentences run concurrently, defendant's argument that imposition of consecutive sentences was unlawful is academic.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.