Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of the court, which credited the testimony of the defendant's medical expert that the decedent's death was the result of coronary artery disease and was not related to the defendant's negligence in administering an antibiotic to which the decedent was allergic, was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and was not against the weight of the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.