1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 261 A.D.2d
  5. 261 A.D.2d 287 (1999)
 

CASHMAN v. ROSENTHAL

261 A.D.2d 287 (1999)

690 N.Y.S.2d 251

MARY E. CASHMAN, Respondent, v. PETER I. ROSENTHAL, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 20, 1999.

Supreme Court properly held defendant in civil contempt without holding a hearing, since it was clear from the papers submitted to the court that there was no issue of fact to be resolved (see, Coronet Capital Co. v Spodek, 202 A.D.2d 20, 29-30), and, in any event, defendant never requested a hearing in opposing the contempt application. In violation of the plain language of the court's prior orders, which directed defendant "NOT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases