Defendant's various challenges to the People's summation are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the remarks in question were proper when viewed in the context of defendant's summation (People v Halm,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BROWNE
259 A.D.2d 286 (1999)
684 N.Y.S.2d 782
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY BROWNE, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 4, 1999.
Decided March 4, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.