We reject defendant's contention that the prosecutor improperly elicited evidence that the undercover officer had engaged in an uncharged drug transaction at defendant's residence. The record shows that the officer never specifically stated that he bought drugs from defendant on a prior occasion, but only that he had made purchases at the building in question. Considering that the jury was later told that other individuals at that location were also selling drugs, it cannot...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
