The court properly denied suppression of defendant's station house statement, as well as preclusion for allegedly deficient CPL 710.30 (1) (a) notice. The hearing evidence establishes that the statement was spontaneous and not in response to any form of police questioning (see, People v Huffman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.