STATE FARM MUT. INS. CO. v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. 97-2594.

225 Wis.2d 305 (1999)

592 N.W.2d 201

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, v. NEENAH MENASHA FORD, ABC Company, a fictitious company, and ABC Insurance Company, a fictitious insurance company, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 4, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there were briefs by Patrick J. Coffey and Menn, Nelson, Sharratt, Teetaert & Beisenstein, Ltd., Appleton and oral argument by Patrick J. Coffey.

For the defendant respondent there was a brief by Peter J. Hickey, Jeffrey T. DeMeuse and Everson, Whitney, Everson & Brehm, Green Bay and Karen Kies DeGrand, Mark M. Burden and Donohue, Brown, Mathewson & Smyth, Chicago, IL and oral argument by Terry E. Johnson of Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C., Milwaukee.


¶ 1. WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.

It is established law in Wisconsin that the economic loss doctrine bars tort recovery for economic loss suffered by commercial entities. This case requires us to determine whether the economic loss doctrine also applies to consumer transactions. The circuit court concluded that the economic loss doctrine bars tort damages for purely economic losses in consumer transactions. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases