The motion court properly denied defendant Kenyon's cross motion for summary judgment as untimely since it was not served within the time frame set by the court pursuant to CPLR 3212 (a) and because Kenyon failed to demonstrate good cause for consideration of the late cross motion. Questions of fact as to the work proximately causing plaintiff's injuries warranted denial of summary judgment in favor of any of the manufacturers or repairers (see, Bral v City of New York...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
