Respondent asserts that it never responded to petitioner's request because it never received it, and argues that even if it had received the request it would not have responded to it, or at best would have denied it, because it seeks the same information as a prior request that had been fully processed. Upon review of the two requests, we find that they are duplicative, and, accordingly, the instant proceeding was properly dismissed as a belated attempt to seek judicial review...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
