U.S. v. ODOM

No. 98-6003.

199 F.3d 321 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Will Brian ODOM, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: December 9, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Gibson (argued and briefed), Federal Public Defender, Memphis, Tennessee, for Defendant-Appellant.

Tony R. Arvin (argued and briefed), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: KEITH, NORRIS, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Will Odom contends on appeal that the district court erred when it elected to sentence him as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, since his prior felony convictions had been "consolidated" for sentencing as contemplated by Application Note 3 to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

On January 9, 1998, defendant entered into...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases