1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 199 F.3d
  5. 199 F.3d 318 (1999)
 

DINSMORE INSTRUMENT CO. v. BOMBARDIER, INC.

No. 98-1951.

199 F.3d 318 (1999)

DINSMORE INSTRUMENT COMPANY; Robert C. Dinsmore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOMBARDIER, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Sea-Doo/Ski-Doo; Digico LTEE, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: December 9, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. George (argued and briefed), George & Haldy, Flint, Michigan, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Dennis Zamplas (argued and briefed), Zamplas & Johnson, Birmingham, Michigan, for Defendant-Appellee Bombardier Inc.

James M. Malloy, III (argued and briefed), Holahan, Malloy, Maybaugh & Monnich, Troy, Michigan, Mary Jo Diegel (briefed), Hutchinson & Paradoski, P.C., Detroit, Michigan, for Defendant-Appellee Digico LTEE.

Before: SUHRHEINRICH, COLE, and GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Dinsmore Instrument Company and Robert C. Dinsmore, its president, appeal from an entry of summary judgment in favor of Bombardier, Inc., doing business as Sea-Doo/Ski-Doo, and Digico LTEE on Dinsmore's tort claims. Dinsmore, as we shall refer to the company and its president, argues that there are genuine issues of fact to be decided and asserts that: (1) under Michigan law the application of the economic loss doctrine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases