It was error to deny defendant-husband a hearing on his cross-motion to terminate maintenance payments based on plaintiff-wife's alleged cohabitation with another man in violation of the terms of the parties' antenuptial agreement. The IAS Court relied upon what the parties' eight-year-old daughter stated during an in camera examination. In another context, this brief interview might be relied upon to provide additional relevant information on the issue. Here, however, the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
