The motion was properly denied, notwithstanding plaintiffs' default in opposing it, because of appellant's counsel's failure to "submit documentation" of his having conferred with opposing counsel, "both by telephone and by letter", in a good faith effort to resolve the matter of plaintiffs' unserved bill of particulars, as required by the motion court's prior order granting appellant's prior motion to compel plaintiffs' service of a bill of particulars but conditioning the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
