STATE EX REL. SHOTTS v. AUSTIN POWDER CO.

No. 96-2342.

84 Ohio St.3d 429 (1999)

THE STATE EX REL. SHOTTS, APPELLANT, v. AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 10, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant.

Duvin, Cahn & Hutton and Christine C. Covey, for appellee Austin Powder Company.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.


Per Curiam.

Claimant asserts that he can do no work and offers the difference between pre-injury and post-injury earnings as proof of IEC. The commission was unpersuaded by claimant's position, as are we.

The commission's order contains several reasons for denying IEC compensation, any of which alone could sustain its decision. Evidence of decreased wages, for example, does not establish an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases