1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 83 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 426 (1999)
 

SCHMOLL v. CHAMPMAN UNIV.

No. G019194.

83 Cal.Rptr.2d 426 (1999)

70 Cal.App.4th 1434

Shaunie Eminger SCHMOLL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Denied June 16, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grace E. Emery, Santa Ana, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rutan & Tucker, Ernest W. Klatte, III, Sandra J. Young and April L. Walter, Costa Mesa, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SONENSHINE, J.

In this case of first impression, we hold the establishment and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution1 bar judicial review in a lawsuit alleging a church-affiliated university modified the terms of employment of its campus chaplain, in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12900 et seq. (FEHA). It matters not whether such an employment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases