Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the weapon recovered from the vehicle which he was driving, as well as statements he made to law enforcement officials, should have been suppressed because the police stop of the vehicle was pretextual. We disagree. The officers properly stopped the vehicle upon observing it turn twice without signaling (see, Whren v United States,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.