LAIDLAW WASTE SYS., INC. v. CONSOL. RAIL CORP.

No. 98-1274.

85 Ohio St.3d 413 (1999)

LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., PETITIONER, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 12, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Habash, Reasoner & Fraiser, Stephen J. Habash and Kirk M. Wall, for petitioner.

Vogelgesang, Howes, Lindamood & Brunn, Phillip E. Howes and Thomas R. Himmelspach, for respondent.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Jeffery S. Sutton and Nora E. Jones, Assistant Attorneys General, in support of petitioner, for amicus curiae Bureau of Workers' Compensation.


LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII, the federal district court has certified the following question of law to this court for our determination:

"What is the effective date of Ohio Revised Code § 4123.93, as enacted by Am. Sub.H.B. No. 107, following the April 8, 1994 order issued in State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Voinovich, 69 Ohio St.3d 225 [631 N.E.2d 582] (1994), and the April 29,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases