1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 260 A.D.2d
  5. 260 A.D.2d 238 (1999)
 

MITNICK v. ROSENTHAL

260 A.D.2d 238 (1999)

688 N.Y.S.2d 150

ROBIN MITNICK, Appellant, v. JESSE ROSENTHAL, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 15, 1999.

We agree with the trial court that application of the statutory formula contained in Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) to any amount over $150,000 would be "unjust or inappropriate" because both parties earn significantly more than $80,000 a year and a strict application of the formula is unnecessary to insure that their children enjoy the same lifestyle as before the separation (cf., Matter of Cassano v Cassano, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases