TWO BRIGHTON AVE. ASSOC. v. CITY OF PASSAIC


18 N.J. Tax 480 (1999)

TWO BRIGHTON AVENUE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Decided September 17, 1999


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Sitar, argued the cause for appellant (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Mr. Sitar, on the brief).

Paul Tannenbaum, argued the cause for respondent (Peter J. Zipp, attorney; Mr. Tannenbaum, on the brief).

Before Judges D'ANNUNZIO and LESEMANN.


PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, plaintiff challenges a tax court judgment which dismissed its tax appeal respecting commercial property in the City of Passaic. The judgment was entered after plaintiff had first failed to provide income information requested by the City and had then failed to present any material at a "reasonableness" hearing held pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-34 and consistent with the decision in Ocean...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases