The record amply demonstrates that defendant acted with two other individuals to rob the three victims. Defendant stood in close proximity and paced the street, looking in various directions, while the victims were deprived of their property, and then drove the car away after the stolen property was placed in it. This permitted the jury to reasonably infer accessorial conduct. Accordingly, the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
