Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it granted the People's request that the defendant display his gold tooth to the jury. Both the complaining witness and another witness testified that the defendant had a gold tooth at the time of the attack (see, People v Caffee,
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the imposition of consecutive...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.