Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court's determination that he had violated the terms of his probation was supported by a preponderance of the evidence adduced at the violation of parole hearing in accordance with the standard set forth in CPL 410.70 (3) (see generally, People v Crandall,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.