1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 81 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 406 (1999)
 

KINGS REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. v. PREMO

No. C027852.

81 Cal.Rptr.2d 406 (1999)

69 Cal.App.4th 215

KINGS REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Brenda PREMO, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 13, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of David Rosenberg, David Rosenberg and Chad Carlock, Davis, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Eisen & Johnston, Jay-Allen Eisen, Sacramento, and Marian M. Johnston, Stockton, for California Rehabilitation Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Charlton G. Holland, III, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frank S. Furtek and Mateo Munoz, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

MORRISON, J.

In this dispute over cuts to reimbursement rates, plaintiff Kings Rehabilitation Center, Inc. (Kings) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate and declaratory relief. In the published portion of this opinion we uphold the practice of "incorporation by reference" of materials into published regulations. We address other points in the unpublished portion of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases