1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 90 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 396 (1999)
 

HANSON v. GRODE

No. B122777.

90 Cal.Rptr.2d 396 (1999)

76 Cal.App.4th 601

Herbert HANSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Marshall GRODE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

As Modified November 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benedon & Serlin, Gerald M. Serlin and Douglas G. Benedon, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hemer, Barkus & Clark, Barbara M. Reardon and Jack Rosenbaum, Glendale, for Defendant and Respondent Marshall Grode.

Patterson, Ritner, Lockwood, Gartner & Jurich, Bakersfield, and Patrick J. Foley, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents Robert Scott Pashman and West Coast Spine Institute.

MASTERSON, J.

Plaintiff Herbert Hanson appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Dr. Marshall Grode, Dr. Robert Pashman, and West Coast Spine Institute.1 We reverse.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Summary judgment is appropriate if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases