1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 225 Wis.2d
  5. 225 Wis.2d 248 (1999)
 

STATE v. EESLEY

No. 97-1839-CR.

225 Wis.2d 248 (1999)

591 N.W.2d 846

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Danny C. EESLEY, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 30, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there was a brief by Kyle H. Torvinen and Hendricks, Knudson, Gee, Hayden & Torvinen, S.C., Superior and oral argument by Kyle H. Torvinen.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

¶ 1. WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.

Petitioner, Danny C. Eesley (Eesley), requests review of a court of appeals' decision that affirmed his conviction. Eesley, urging a dismissal of the charges, argues that a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum used to deliver him to Wisconsin, was a detainer within the meaning of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers ("IAD" or "Agreement"). Therefore, he argues, according to the provisions of the IAD the failure to bring him to trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases