1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 84 Ohio
  5. 84 Ohio St.3d 383 (1999)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ATKIN

No. 98-713.

84 Ohio St.3d 383 (1999)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ATKIN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 13, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Sanford I. Atkin, pro se.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We are particularly disturbed by respondent's suggestion that he could bribe United States District Judge George W. White, Jr. Representations of this kind deserve the severest of sanctions. First, such statements violate DR 9-101(C) (a lawyer shall not state or imply that he is able to influence improperly or upon irrelevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases