1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 198 F.3d
  5. 198 F.3d 266 (1999)
 

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. v. F.E.R.C.

No. 98-1409.

198 F.3d 266 (1999)

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. Semco Energy Gas Company, et al., Intervenors

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 14, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence G. Acker argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Mary A. Murphy and Merlin E. Remmenga. F. Nan Todd Wagoner and Richard J. Kruse, Jr., entered appearances.

Judith A. Albert, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Jay L. Witkin, Solicitor, and Susan J. Court, Special Counsel.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, SILBERMAN and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

Harry T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

Petitioner, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. ("Panhandle"), implores this court to vacate two opinions of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission") that have been rendered moot by a settlement entered into between Panhandle and a group of its customers. Panhandle argues that, because FERC concedes that the two opinions do not reflect final orders and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases