Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant's current specific claims of error regarding the court's denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would agree with the court's finding that the warrantless search of the shopping bag recovered from the car where defendant had been sitting was lawful, since the police had probable cause to arrest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.