Assuming in plaintiff's favor that defendant, not his firm's office manager, was the person at the firm who decided to terminate the firm's relationship with plaintiff, and that defendant made this decision not because plaintiff increased its rates but because plaintiff refused defendant's demand that it procure for him hockey tickets that would have cost it $8,000, the action must be dismissed in the absence of evidence tending to show that, in demanding the hockey tickets...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
