1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 81 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 360 (1999)
 

SCHEIDING v. DINWIDDIE CONST. CO.

No. A076930.

81 Cal.Rptr.2d 360 (1999)

69 Cal.App.4th 64

Robert SCHEIDING et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DINWIDDIE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

January 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brayton Harley Curtis, Philip A Harley, Novato, James L. Oberman, Hercules, Gordon R. Levinson, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, John Curran Ladd, Mary Ellen Gambino and Kathleen A. Clark, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.

LAMBDEN, J.

In this case we gauge the evidence that must be "shown" to support a summary judgment motion in order to require the party opposing the motion to take up the burden of producing countervailing evidence.

Plaintiffs Robert and Rae Scheiding filed this action for damages following Robert's diagnosis with asbestosis and asbestos-related pleural disease. Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Dinwiddie Construction Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases