The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the lineup identification testimony. The record supports the court's finding that defendant's arraignment was delayed solely so that the numerous witnesses from multiple robberies in at least two counties could view defendant in a lineup, and not to gain an unfair advantage (see, People v Sease,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.