1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 60 F.Supp.2d
  5. 60 F.Supp.2d 380 (1999)
 

MOTLEY v. MOTLEY

No. CIV. A. 98-391(JEI).

60 F.Supp.2d 380 (1999)

Ann MOTLEY, Plaintiff, v. Thomas MOTLEY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 13, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gorman & Rauth, by John R. Rauth, Rio Grande, NJ, for Plaintiff.

Law Office of Robert H. Montgomery, by Robert H. Montgomery, Camden, NJ, for Defendant.

OPINION

IRENAS, District Judge.

Before this court is defendant Thomas Motley's ("defendant") motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). Defendant alleges that summary judgement is appropriate because plaintiff Ann Motley's ("plaintiff") claim is barred by the statute of limitations as set fourth in N.J.S.A. 12A:3-122 which requires that an action be commenced within six years after a note is negotiated.

The plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases