1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 266 A.D.2d
  5. 266 A.D.2d 168 (1999)
 

PEOPLE v. HAMED

266 A.D.2d 168 (1999)

700 N.Y.S.2d 104

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ABDULAH HAMED, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 30, 1999.

The court properly exercised its discretion in waiting until after defendant's direct testimony to sever the joint trials of defendant and his codefendant, and the timing of the severance caused no prejudice to defendant. Prior to that point in the trial, there was no "irreconcilable conflict" in the defenses presented (People v Mahboubian, 74 N.Y.2d 174, 185). Defendant's claim that he was prejudiced by the admission of evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases