Substantial evidence, including the testimony of the complainant and his wife, supports respondents' determination that petitioner Queally used unnecessary force in effecting an improper arrest against the complainant, and that Officer Nicastro addressed the complainant inappropriately during the same improper arrest (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF NICASTRO v. SAFIR
266 A.D.2d 167 (1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 481
In the Matter of ANN NICASTRO et al., Petitioners, v. HOWARD SAFIR, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 30, 1999.
Decided November 30, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.