The motion for the disqualification of defendant's counsel was properly denied. While the conduct upon which the motion is premised cannot be condoned, it was evidently isolated and, plaintiff's argument to the contrary notwithstanding, we perceive no ground to conclude that it will have sequelae detrimental to counsel's representation of defendant in this matter (cf., Grunberg v Feller,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MILLER v. MEI
265 A.D.2d 168 (1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 410
LARRY MILLER, Appellant, v. XIAO MEI, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 5, 1999.
Decided October 5, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
