The court properly exercised its discretion when it charged the jury on murder in the second degree, followed by the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance, followed by the defense of justification. We find that the order selected by the court followed a logical pattern and could not have caused defendant any prejudice.
Defendant's general objection failed to preserve his challenges to a detective's testimony concerning ankle holsters (see, People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
