Defendant fails to adduce facts supporting his claim that the guarantees in issue were part of a fraudulent scheme to deprive him of his bank building. All that appears is that defendant, a banker with law degrees, faced with an imminent foreclosure of the building, agreed to an arrangement that, structured as a sale to plaintiffs in consideration of a $3 million loan and a leaseback with an option to purchase, enabled him to retain possession of the building for several...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
