As the motion court found, third-party defendants, although non-New York domiciliaries, were subject to the jurisdiction of New York courts since they purposefully transacted business in this State (see, CPLR 302 [a]) by having representatives perform business activities here on their behalf, which activities were substantially related to the subject matter of the third-party action (see, Kappas v T.W. Kutter, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PARAMOUNT ADJUSTMENT CO., INC. v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
267 A.D.2d 151 (1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 866
PARAMOUNT ADJUSTMENT CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. JORGE A. PENA et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 21, 1999.
Decided December 21, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.