1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 56 F.Supp.2d
  5. 56 F.Supp.2d 360 (1999)
 

CONNOLLY v. BIDERMANN INDUSTRIES U.S.A., INC.

No. 95 Civ. 1791(RPP).

56 F.Supp.2d 360 (1999)

Diana Campbell CONNOLLY, Plaintiff, v. BIDERMANN INDUSTRIES U.S.A., INC., Bidermann Industries Corporation, Great American Knitting Mills, Harold Ray Russell, and James A. Williams, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Camhy Karlinsky & Stein LLP, Martin E. Karlinsky, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Roberts & Finger, LLP, Joel L. Finger, Jean L. Schmidt, New York City, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Now pending before the Court is the motion of defendants Bidermann Industries U.S.A., Inc., Bidermann Industries Corporation, Great American Knitting Mills ("Great American"), Harold Ray Russell, and James A. Williams ("defendants") for judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, for an amendment to the judgment reducing the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases