BUTIGIAN v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY


266 A.D.2d 133 (1999)

699 N.Y.S.2d 41

MARK M. BUTIGIAN et al., Appellants, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al., Respondents. GUY CARPENTER & CO., INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. COMPUTERCOOL AIR CONDITIONING CORP., Third-Party Defendant. (And Another Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 30, 1999.


An issue of fact exists as to whether defendants failed to furnish plaintiff with proper protection in violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) (compare, Kijak v 330 Madison Ave. Corp., 251 A.D.2d 152). Plaintiff's claims under Labor Law § 200 were properly dismissed as against defendants owner and tenant of the worksite premises, there being no evidence that they exercised supervisory control over plaintiff's work (see, Comes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases