1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 23 S.W.3d
  5. 23 S.W.3d 372 (1999)
 

NGC v. MIDGARD ENERGY CO.

No. 07-99-0038-CV.

23 S.W.3d 372 (1999)

NATURAL GAS CLEARINGHOUSE, Appellant, v. MIDGARD ENERGY COMPANY, Formerly Known As Maxus Exploration Company, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

Opinion Granting Rehearing January 3, 2000.

Rehearing Overruled February 14, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hinkle Cox Eaton Coffield Hensley LLP, Wyatt L. Brooks, Amarillo, Thompson & Knight, Craig A. Haynes, Beverly Ray Burlingame, Dallas, for appellant.

Sprouse Smith & Rowley PC, Harlow Sprouse, Matthew McCann, Amarillo, for appellee.

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ.

REAVIS, Justice.

By this appeal, Natural Gas Clearinghouse (NGC) challenges the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Midgard Energy Company, formerly known as Maxus Exploration Company (Midgard). Instead of presenting one broad issue as recognized in Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. Napier, 461 S.W.2d 119, 121 (Tex.1970), NGC contends by five issues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases