The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of defendant's participation in the drug transaction, including his unequivocal affirmative response to the undercover officer's query as to whether he was "working" as well as his conduct throughout the transaction.
Defendant's various arguments concerning his application to have the trial prosecutor recused are indistinguishable from arguments...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
