STEINER v. LOZYNIAK


261 A.D.2d 131 (1999)

687 N.Y.S.2d 256

KENNETH STEINER, Appellant, v. ANDREW LOZYNIAK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 1999.


We agree with the motion court that plaintiff fails to make a meritorious showing of self-dealing or bad faith by defendants such as would warrant judicial inquiry into their decisions with respect to the subject merger in derogation of the business judgment rule (see, Norlin Corp. v Rooney, Pace, 744 F.2d 255, 264-265). Nor does plaintiff show any wrongful means necessary to his claim for tortious interference with prospective business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases