The IAS Court properly precluded plaintiff's expert from testifying with respect to Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome, without a hearing, on the ground that plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether such a diagnosis has gained general acceptance in the scientific community after defendants had made a prima facie showing that it has not (see, Frank v State of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
OPPENHEIM v. UNITED CHARITIES OF NEW YORK
266 A.D.2d 116 (1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 144
VICKI OPPENHEIM, Appellant, v. UNITED CHARITIES OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 23, 1999.
Decided November 23, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.