The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence from which the jury could have reasonably inferred defendant's accessorial liability, including defendant's presence in the vehicle from which the forged instruments were recovered and his possession of bank records linked to the account of one of the payees of the those instruments. Moreover, there were actions and statements by defendant evincing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
